Story 66. Written by Rosa J. Vargas

Someone was walking down the street and met a beggar. The beggar asked for a small amount of spare change. The person took out a hundred-dollar bill and asked the beggar: "Do you believe in God?"

If you believe in God, then you must believe in the Devil too. If God sent his only son to earth, why couldn't the Devil send his only daughter? Surely, if God has a son, then the Devil must have a daughter. What if God isn't all-powerful on earth? Then, obviously, the Devil isn't either. Everything points to this. No one has ever been struck down by God's wrath in their lifetime. Maybe God can't even get angry. This should be fairly obvious. It must be God's nature. If He could influence our decisions one way or another, what would be the point of Heaven or Hell? What would be the point of anything on earth if there were no free will? If there were no responsibility for our actions? If God could intervene, we could just claim we were following orders or that we weren't aware of our responsibility because the One who could have intervened didn't. Obviously, if He did intervene, we'd just be His puppets. If we were doing something bad, He'd say it served a greater purpose, and you couldn't do anything else. I decide, not you. Even if it were against your nature or your will. In that case, why should we go to Heaven or Hell? What would be the point? You wouldn't be deciding how to live your life. Therefore, it's almost certain that He can't intervene. This is evident in the world. He doesn't weigh our souls after death either. The Devil and God are just regents in their own realms. God can't understand evil or badness; He can't judge because, if He did, He'd be acting against His nature. Didn't He say through His son, "Judge not, lest ye be judged"? How can humanity expect a being who can't be bad and who is all goodness to condemn people or souls to damnation? Homo sapiens can't grasp fundamental things, like these lines either. Obviously, they can't figure it out on their own. But the question arises: if their eyes are opened, can they understand? Most certainly can't, nor are they interested. Who actually decides? Who goes where after death? Or is it all a bunch of nonsense? If there is a God, why would He care about miserable humans? Or if there is one, it's still not certain there's a Heaven and Hell. It was obviously invented to keep people in line and submissive at a time when there wasn't much happiness in the world. Life here is terrible, but if you behave well, what bliss awaits you in Heaven. Obviously, if there isn't a committee that decides who goes to Hell or Heaven, and there isn't, at least I don't know of one, and I don't think anyone does, then it can't exist. How do you get in? Who decides? If you change during your life, maybe you decline or become a different person, which one gets in? Or maybe one goes to Hell and the other to Heaven? I've now proven, as the Jews have long known, that there is no Heaven or Hell. There is no God, at least not one who would even notice us. And there's certainly no one who would want to notice us. In reality, everything is a play of our imagination. We live in a quantum field, a game. If we pay attention to the game, it seems real; if we don't pay attention, it behaves like a wave. Actually, humans are as if someone from an advanced society that might only develop thousands of years from now were to drop back here into prehistoric times. Their mind, their brain, would be capable of normal thinking, but these prehistoric conditions prevent them from understanding. It's as if animal raised a human child. They have no idea what could happen to them if they hadn't lost their way. Although such people founded Rome. Obviously, if they hadn't returned to their own habitat, they would have died without knowing what a city was. So, we can't say these things from here. What is the meaning of life? Maybe later generations will figure this out and everyone will know; it will spread through humanity's consciousness. Right now, here in the dark ages, because we don't have any information that anyone would share with us that we could interpret, and we aren't able to understand ourselves, we live in ignorance. Who knows when the mind that will answer the questions will be born, and then this information will become available to everyone, like mathematics is now? If we remove Heaven and Hell from the equation, the whole thing must still have meaning. What a triviality it is, by the way, isn't it? Suffering for eternity, no forgiveness, or being happy for eternity. I could get bored with both in a few million years. Maybe it's that we only see one plane of the quantum field, which we call reality, in this life. However, we make decisions every moment. These decisions lead in one direction. This is our life path. Let's say we die, and the quantum field opens up. We could do every decision in our life differently. We could set goals for ourselves that could be achieved from that base. It could be good or bad because a negative experience is still an experience, isn't it? Anything could happen to us after death; we could shape anything according to our ideas. For example, if I didn't go to that school, that wouldn't be my partner, and so on. So, a nearly virtual world may open up to us where you can be what you want, you can experience what you want. You can somehow reach your goals. You can experience everything. You can be like God. Now, an eternity could be spent with this. It wouldn't be eternally boring, like the poor homo sapiens’ way of thinking about Heaven and Hell. Here, anything could happen that you can imagine. Different minds could even connect to experience things together. Maybe at both ends. In this world, there is no good and evil. There are only good and bad experiences. Then things can change, and roles can be switched so that everyone can participate in every phase of the experience. Obviously, there is so much time to spend that you can not only live your own life, but you can also travel in time and space for experiences. Who gets good and bad? Who controls the quantum field? There must be a storage place where your mind or your experiences, your memories, are accessible. Obviously, you can't be aware of everything that has already happened to you. No one can possess such a mass of information. Maybe God can. What does this resemble? Isn't it like the Matrix? It's as if we lived in a virtual world. Maybe this is reality? Right now, you are experiencing an experience, which is your life. Good or bad things may happen to you; in any case, experiences. For most of us, they are bad, or this is the realm of negative experiences. Or this is the Hell that you have created for yourself, obviously to punish yourself for what you have done during your life. If we look at it this way, Heaven and Hell still exist. You are the one who makes the decision about where you will end up.

Perhaps a more evolved being or a more advanced variation of homo sapiens or, say, the gods of the Mayans can already sense or even control this quantum field. So, what is God? I've already said, every variation of every viewpoint of everything that exists. Homo sapiens can only live one life. The next variation, however, will live forever. What would be the point for homo sapiens to be immortal? It would be like being buried alive. Like solitary confinement. Which lasts forever. It is not much better than passing away. Darkness and complete annihilation? Then there is no suffering, no boredom. What distinguishes homo sapiens from animals? Practically nothing. Can it sweat and throw things? It is rather at a disadvantage. It lives its whole life afraid of death, of passing away, of aging, of suffering. Afraid of everything. What a rudimentary species. It never leaves the beaten path for the untrodden. It sees nothing of the world. It should be happy that there is death. Its life is meaningless and monotonous. It only sees three dimensions. It only sees the illusion of the fourth. Wherever we look in the universe, we only see a still image. Like a photograph. Homo sapiens has no chance to perceive movement here, that is, time. It would have to live much longer. Its mind is not developed enough to comprehend that there is a chance, because there is a collective human consciousness, but the species would have to exist for a very long time, and every single individual could sense it somewhere. Even if they are long dead because they will always be present in the consciousness of the species. However, this species has only been on the planet for 50,000 years. Homo erectus existed for millions of years, australopithecus for three hundred thousand years. What chance does this species have to exist for so long? If, let's say, a more advanced species saw three dimensions, then homo sapiens would see two. What a difference! It represents orders of magnitude. This species rules a planet. Over the other living things. However, this is not necessarily bad in the long run. Obviously not. Here there really is extinction, destruction awaits the whole planet. However, a wonderful flower can grow on these ruins. Maybe it shouldn't be this way, and it would be a much better path for everyone if this species would wake up a little, but there is little chance of this. If God exists, it seems that this is the plan he is following. He will wait until homo sapiens dances the dance of death, and at least the species after it will have a bad example. The best thing you can do is to do the opposite of homo sapiens in everything. Then you can't go wrong. This was my educational principle too. I watched how my parents did it, and I did the opposite with my offspring. It worked perfectly. It seems that a bad example is needed. We cannot appreciate the good if we do not know the bad. We cannot appreciate health if we do not know disease. I think this is the mission of homo sapiens in this world. And obviously to turn food into manure. Obviously, there are more intelligent individuals who already think differently and understand and comprehend a lot of things. However, their number is so insignificant and fractional, and they have so little say and power, that they cannot influence the outcome. The intellectual level of homo sapiens is exactly the same as that of locusts. They devour their environment, multiply as long as they can, and then starve when there is nothing left to eat. The only problem is that while locusts only devastate certain areas of the planet, homo sapiens devastates the entire planet. So obviously if God has a son, then the devil must have a daughter. God, who has no power over the earth, sent his only son to open the eyes. He failed miserably. Suppose the devil sends his only daughter to earth, what will be her fate among these people who are more base than animals? The answer is clear. If the world does not need God and his son, then the world will sell its soul to the devil and his daughter.

I don't owe anyone
or if I do, then forget it!
He gets it in the afterlife,
the devil guards it!

Saturday, May 14, 2025 7:03 AM

They say there are cardinal sins. Let's take just one. What is the one greatest sin of homo sapiens, from which all other sins stem? Obviously, envy. Suppose this did not exist or was overcome. What kind of world would it be then, what would it have been, what would evolution be like then. Human ignorance has stalled evolution. What is the biggest problem in the world? Obviously, overpopulation. More and more individuals have access to the existing limited resources, everyone needs living space, food, energy. This must be taken from other living beings, even from each other, because the possibilities are limited. What would the world have been like if the male individuals had not taken over the rule of humanity? Or what could the world have been like before it took over? Obviously, if the female individual had been normal-minded, or if it was, it would not have wanted to create offspring that worked perfectly and looked good at the age of ten or twenty, but later, in ten or twenty years, was already run down and in need of care, but one that did not struggle with diseases, dementia, stupefaction, addictions, and so on during its lifetime. What follows from this? In the past, it helped evolution if female individuals mated with older male individuals for the purpose of procreation. The older individuals already show what their genes are like. If at the age of 70 he is still doing well and is mentally stable and has not been physically devastated, then if a female individual thinks or has thought logically, she would certainly want or have wanted offspring from him. Because then that offspring will also have similar characteristics and will not be in need of guardianship but will be strong, and may even help the female individual when she gets old. Perhaps this is how it happened in the past. Then came the men's revolution when they took over the rule of the female branch of homo sapiens. Everything went wrong. Evolution stopped, even turned backwards. We live in this age now. What would the future be like if homo sapiens survived, or what would it take for it to survive? Obviously, radical change. First of all, female rule. Giving back the power to the women that was theirs at the beginning, at all levels. Let's see how the more developed species or the more developed variations of homo sapiens do it in the future! Obviously, the number of individuals is limited on each planet. It cannot be allowed that individual male individuals have too many offspring, no matter how special they are. This would eventually lead to inbreeding. What is the future of eugenics? A woman can have one child, with a few exceptions, of course. A man can have ten at most. Women have to pay very close attention to what kind of offspring they will have because they only have one chance. In the future, it is rare for a living person to have offspring, a living man. Because technology makes it possible to freeze genetic material. When the male individual lives his life, it is possible to analyze these genes that he carried, what quality of life they provided. During his life, he can freeze sperm from a young age. Later, female individuals can choose a donor based on the available information. There must also be a ranking among women, according to which the order of choice is regulated. However, it is by no means certain that women with the best gene pool will choose the seemingly best gene pool man. There is an instinct in women that can decide which individual's genetic material is best for her. The question of races arises. Nothing regulates this either. There are no restrictions on the free choice of women. They choose their own race for the most part anyway. If they don't, it's beneficial because it makes the genes more varied. Over millions of years, skin color or anything else can be manipulated naturally. Obviously, people do not conceive in vitro. There must be competition between the sperm. So only natural fertilization is accepted. Or since that is not possible in this case, the perfect copy of it.

Well, this is the revolution of consciousness!
The game has begun!

7:59 AM

End.

Son of God and the Devil's Daughter